I’m thinking the same.
With the amount of filter cake embedded in them taking up pore space I’d be surprised if the 5 reservoir SWCs they had weren’t under-representing poroperm on testing so they just haven’t bothered reporting them (as well as 5 reservoir data points not being a statistically robust / representative basis to report on given how thick the UA is)
I’m thinking the same. With the amount of filter cake embedded...
Add IVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
7.1¢ |
Change
0.002(2.90%) |
Mkt cap ! $100.6M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 6.9¢ | 7.1¢ | 6.9¢ | $48.24K | 690.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13000 | 7.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2¢ | 218454 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.58pm 21/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
7.1¢ |
Change
0.002 ( 3.20 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 6.9¢ | 7.1¢ | 6.9¢ | 930429 | ||
| Last updated 15.58pm 21/05/2024 ? | |||||
| IVZ (ASX) Chart |