You talk revisionary excrement.Firstly, you were gung ho during...

You talk revisionary excrement.

Firstly, you were gung ho during the CR trading halt. During the TH and after the CR details (inc. PDCO approval) were known, you were claiming there’s nothing to not like, and that the share price will open after the TH and go past 40c. Do you want me to paste your actual posts? It wasn’t until it opened at 24c and proceeded to drop in price, and you had to eat humble pie, that your dissatisfaction grew (that assumes that your HC posts were your true feelings which is drawing a long bow imo).

Secondly they couldn’t have raised $37 million at 18c earlier from sophs and Instos because there was insufficient demand and they would have had to call an EGM as the dilution would have been over the limits.

So what your saying is that everyone (inc. yourself) is allowed to criticise the “elected board” with hindsight, but no one is allowed to advise them?

So you’re not so worried by Sam’s influence on HC investors, you’re worried about his influence on Board and management in private meetings.

No wonder you dislike and harass Sam, because you’re afraid of his perceived power.