"we are the most efficient and effective means of enriching uranium for power generation"
"world is realizing that Conventional Trumps Conceptual"
SK, let me remind you that when it comes to uranium enrichment, the "Conventional" method is Centrifuge enrichment, while "Conceptual" methods apply to Laser Enrichment. While it has been proven on a Test Loop scale that SILEX works, no commercial facility has ever been built that proves beyond doubt that laser enrichment is a techno-economically viable method. So whilst I agree that "conventional" nuclear power reactors currently trumps "conceptual" fast breeder reactors, the same holds true when comparing enrichment technologies.
You also state that "we can efficiently and effectively separate some of the Good U out of the enrichment poo for which can then be reused". What do you mean by Good U?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Japan shuts down "Dream Reactor" that costed US$9 bn
"we are the most efficient and effective means of enriching...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add SLX (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$4.20 |
Change
-0.045(1.06%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.007B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$4.27 | $4.32 | $4.19 | $626.1K | 147.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
25 | 2662 | $4.19 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$4.20 | 3447 | 19 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
27 | 3461 | 4.190 |
13 | 5275 | 4.180 |
15 | 20414 | 4.170 |
8 | 3162 | 4.160 |
7 | 34653 | 4.150 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
4.200 | 3312 | 18 |
4.210 | 4254 | 18 |
4.220 | 6953 | 13 |
4.230 | 3014 | 9 |
4.240 | 9931 | 12 |
Last trade - 13.01pm 15/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
SLX (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO & Managing Director
Charles Armstrong
CEO & Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online