jh should change ucg name to iscg or isdcg

Part of email from Swann Hills Synfuells, Alberta, USA:

"We refer to our practice as ISCG (In-situ Coal Gasification) to distinguish it from the more familiar and prevalent UCG which is much more shallow and less environmentally advantaged than ISCG.

We produced syngas on a demonstration basis last July. We will start a full subsurface scale demonstration project next month and run that for about a year.
We plan a site release of our commercial project in mid 2012 and to be in full commercial operation by mid 2015.
See our website for further information."
----------------------------------

Just a suggestion for JH to more easily market/strategise CTP's underground coal resource for the future, in light of environmental/political and bad media issues regarding UCG. (CSM/CSG will be even a more hot potato in the future)

Change the name to for example, as above or, ... "In Situ Deep Coal Gasification" (ISDCG), because from my understanding CTP has a lot of deep coal as well as unlogged coal deeper than 1000m.

CTP is strategically and geologically placed to take advantage of such a name change IMO, ... so I will email JH of my suggestion.

Ravi