jh, page-3

I'm not disagreeing with you, but why?

just because he is reasonable and "solid and reliable" how will that benefit the company?

What does he bring to the company that RC cannot?

What is the plan for the company under JH?


So far, the general consensus from these road shows by RC is that he too is reasonable and reliable. He has outlined a plan for the company, and in general it seems investors are happy with that.

What can JH bring to the table that is over and above this?

Again not trying to argue, just would like some reasons why he "must be brought back".