john campbell of ogw, page-37

Well yet again - thats very unsporting and equally inconsistent from you kooka. But I guess thats how we treat any question that threatens to expose us. Its not sensitive info or priviledged info - its just a simple request to ask what on earth are you on about because your original post is gibberish. You have no trouble putting a great many questions to me - which i have done my best to fully answer for you - but you cant respond to a simple request for a bit of clarity..."because I'm not a shareholder". I have to say such a non answer does more TO your credibiltiy than answering my questions could have. I think you would have been better off to try to answer them purely from your own cred. point of view. Oh well. No drama..whats done is done now.

I'll bet theres more than 1 shareholder out there scratching their head over exactly what you meant, though...or drawn their own conclusion already.