John Farnham

Originally posted by Bananabender1: ↑

FYI
The Voice provides permanent representation and recognition for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in the Constitution.
The Voice will be a new body thatrepresentsAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people from across Australia to provide their input into the decisions, policies and laws that are made by the government and parliament.
This is consistent with theUN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which says Indigenous peoples have a right to participate in government decision-making in matters that affect their rights, through their own political institutions.
Across the world, similar types of institutions and relationships have been established, including inSweden, Norway and Finland with the Sami people, and with the Māori in Aotearoa. There are also many similar relationships that Indigenous peoples have with the state in North and South America.
However, it’s also important to remember the Voice has been developed as a response to our local circumstances, and in particular, the lack of formal agreement – such as a treaty – or formal recognition of the rightful place of First Nations in Australia.
In Australia, the Voice will be constitutionally enshrined. This means successive governments can’t overturn it. It will be established as a new constitutional body in a new chapter (Chapter 9) at the end of the Constitution.

The Voice: what is it, where did it come from, and what can it achieve? (unsw.edu.au)

Expand

What does 'constitutionally enshrined' really mean? It is really a head of power for the federal government not a demand, otherwise we would have an 'Interstate Commission' (Sect 101 of the constitution). The true "voice" powers, role and financing will be defined by legislation & regulations not the few lines in the constitution. This does mean the later governments could remove or minimize the Voice by legislation or removal of funding - though likely to be politically difficult unless the Voice is proving to be very 'troublesome'.
I am a little cynical, though recognition is good, any such body, though it may start with noble aims and good intentions, is political, it will eventually be corrupted by political & personal agendas that have little to do with bettering Aboriginal & Islander conditions or society in general.