1) its clear you understand very little . again the in ground value of tanbreez is about six times that of etm . yes tanbreez has no waste because it can sell its waste at a profit with about 50% of the cash flow coming from REE, with a lower capex ,lower opex and larger cash returns perhaps you need to go a re write this comment
2) funny i have never got that from either the last board and certainly not from the new board they are supporting the idea of working together. i am not concerned about etm opening a mine next door in fact i would welcome especially as they are not competition ,yes the etm mine is a decade or so behind but that does not effect that position
3) here you go again deliberately misleading you know that what little Dy you have is mostly in the mineral eudialyte which as you know is a silicate and not recoverable in your circuit and its thrown out. Your ree cash flow will come about 90% from Nd and Pr the prices of which to are about to be collapsed by the chinese 4) again you really need to get up to speed all exploitation licenses have continual reporting conditions all of which are complete and waiting on the GoG replies welcome to greenland red tape capital of the world
again you go off on suppling proof, its all here, a 65 volume feasibility study, a 10000 pages or so summary report ,mines plans ,414 drill holes, 709 tons of bulk samples and about half a million assays and you want that all put up here you got to be kidding just act like many others go and look
ETM Price at posting:
3.3¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
(20min delay)