Joining the chorus, page-43

More rubbish never met trump. To bring you up to speed etm have a contract to sell reo conc to China at an unspecified price. tanbreez has chosen to sell else where .Nothing wrong with either companies actions. The difference is one has the right to mine the other has not yet got to that stage and clearly has more work to do on their eia .To take on a govt as they have in my opinion was a silly move, you never will against a govt. and even if they do the result has be the same and that is to be asked to go and do the environmental report . At the very least ,now they are to dump more uranium. Any govt especially a govt that thinks it is being forced will ask for much more work on that aspect alone. So as a share holder i see the court action as a big negative for not only etm but all mining in Greenland