Joining the chorus, page-9

Troy everybody here sees what you're trying to do. That's why you're only like is GGB

You again have taken something out of context to fit your agenda.

First of all the article says that any mining in the vicinity of inhabited areas.It would be questionable whether a small country town I've only a thousand odd people. Could be considered close to a mine some seven odd kilometres away.

Even if they considered it so. The next point is the quotation says that the nearby town would need to understand. This does not say approve. If that was the case there was another mine close to the town who was not approved and was not even fully understood well by the citizens of the same town yet it was approved. So again you can see how you try to take it out of context and nobody is falling for it here.

Further you then go on to say how the company wishes to dump millions of tons of radioactive waste with radioactivity levels in multiples higher than background levels. Again this is misinformation. The disposed slurry. Will be fully contained. It will be no more radioactive than the natural river silt and all of that radioactivity will dissipate over the course of 10 to 20 years. Again we can see you're trying to scare investors with fraudulent rhetoric.

You then go on to say that the storage of water is risky and not sustainable and certainly not an industry best.It is in fact following best practises of both Greenland and international law. So it is the best. Further, there is no reference to how this could not be considered unsustainable. It's just a word that you've used that has no relevance. Again rhetoric.

Then you say that future generations will need to deal with it. But you don't say what it is. It isn't radioactivity. Because there won't be any there. It isn't killing anything in the natural surrounds. As there is no fish in the lake and there are rarely any birds ever present. It is an arid landscape much like Mars. Sparce weeds as vegetation. All barely anyone ever visits. So what exactly is being left for anyone thats not already left there and how will anyone ever be effected. Especially when and if the mine closes down in perhaps 50 years or so. The area will still be under licence attended by ETM. Until such time as the stored water meets natural background levels again. It is a part of the agreement. Again your rhetoric is not well researched and clearly invalid.

Now you try to refer to a number of high profile wet tailing storage facility failures over the years. However you failed to mention that most of these were some 40 odd years ago. In a world where we adapt and learn and advances in technology have concluded we're such instances are now very rare. Again, we find, your rhetoric invalid and inaccurate.

Now you go on to say that dumping will occur in the lake. Causing huge levels of radioactivity. Again, totally ridiculous. Refer to the above and refer to the company EIA before you comment about something you clearly have little understanding?Again, the company does not need local approval. The company needs government approval. Stop trying to make it sound like something else.

Until then you remind me of a particular someone in the anti-Iranian group. You presented all these points and had them dismissed. Not only on their Facebook page but attempted to do the same on GGG's Facebook page. Which was all quickly dismissed and ended in the accusation of 'mining greed'.It is very unusual that you would present in the exact same manner and considering your affiliation with IA. It's become very obvious as to your intent and why.

Now in closing you say that no logical arguement that any reasonable individual could make against your concern. I would present the above and ask you to reply to any correction Ive made upon yur wild inaccurate claims.. But unfortunately you never seem to be able to and I wonder why you never can.

Be more attentive to your own misguided desperate endevours. Then a mine who keeps theirs entirely open.. Integrity and honesty is the best path inside any moral man.