joint venture, page-6

I think your right malio - more likely to be a third party involved, that's the way I read it.

We already have a JV with CAZ and if we were doing another one then it wouldn't be 'significant' imo. I tend to think a third party is being brought in here to spice up the current JV w CAZ. But could be wrong. Time will tell.

All the best holders.


PS don't forget we just hit 1m at 134g/t gold - That seems to have been missed lol the shares should be 50c on that news alone