Harsh question to ask, but think it really needs to be asked. Does Scott think he is the best person to lead Invictus now that we've claimed a discovery? They need for technical expertise is lower and the need for someone who can handle the corporate side of things is critical and we don't have that person.
I know it's harsh but without asking tough questions this fireside will be the same as all the others where Scott is baffled why we're so undervalued and doesn't realise it's his job to market and sell the potential of the company.
Harsh question to ask, but think it really needs to be asked....
Add IVZ (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
7.0¢ |
Change
-0.001(1.41%) |
Mkt cap ! $99.25M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 7.1¢ | 7.2¢ | 6.9¢ | $132.1K | 1.881M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20336 | 6.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1¢ | 265794 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 02/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
7.0¢ |
Change
-0.001 ( 0.00 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 7.1¢ | 7.1¢ | 6.9¢ | 475453 | ||
| Last updated 15.48pm 02/05/2024 ? | |||||
| IVZ (ASX) Chart |