JS on Smart Investor (video interview), page-63

I watched the video last night but was just going back over the comments/questions. It's interesting to note that at least one of the questions have since been deleted/censored. There was no abuse or profanity that might breach terms of use. The question was asked early on about the shorting of BIG by a particular fund. PC and JS chose to ignore it and not address it on the video but interesting to see that it's now been censored. I wonder why?

The only other questions that were not addressed on the video (despite there being asked well before the end of the video) were:
- Can you please explain what you meant with 'Inside the Boiler Room"and how does it apply to BIG UN?
- You seem to have taken particular delight in repeating things such as Brendon's dyslexia and Richard's past. How many times can a journalist repeat these kinds of things without it being deemed harassment?

It's a shame they've asked for questions and then chosen to censor and/or ignore them?