judgement day in two weeks, page-4

Hello Isladar,

Well that was interesting...

Your post is incredibly poor form IMO. You accuse (/imply) Sempro of fraud, display no knowledge of Nepean or TI or geology or FML or CRE for that matter.

$100M to develop Nepean, not worth anything :-) oh come on pull the other one this has to be tongue in cheek so good one I give you that much if this was your intent. On nepean - get out your calculator and enter 13,200 x $18,000 and then add 2g/t PGE's @ 50/50 platinum: palladium. Add some other base metal credits too while you are at it. Further drilling indicated an ingress through ore with nice grade... Did you read anything on this at all mate?

Kal - biggest TU possible that was a great reply to a blatant stir IMO. At least it broke the boredom mentioned by F&F.

Isladar you know what they say about opinions and you are welcome to yours but how about putting up your proof that samples were fraudulent from Sempro - and your facts and research in making the comparison between CTO and FML are valid.

Is that based on production? Kindly put up or...

Thought about just reporting the post on valid grounds but want people to see your post and read it for themselves what a classic. They can take you as they will. I agree with you that NGF is a goer and this is where it stops apparently.

Thought about putting you on ignore but sort of miss a certain mass 'discusser' in a strange sort of way... (ahem not really). But then you do at least open up the opportunity to discuss certain aspects and for this I thank you for your "post".

I finally thought it might be fun to challenge you after talking to a partner at Sempro just now about their feelings on your comments. Articulate your accusation please and while you are at it the ability of FML to conduct appropriate DD on behalf of their shareholders.

Best regards,
CW
DYOR&DD