Julian Leeser explains the Lib view., page-2

"and finally the matter of Dutton repeatedly asking for the detail which they all know will be developed in parliament after the referendum."

These are the 15 questions
1. Who will be eligible to serve on the body?
2. What are the prerequisites for nomination?
3. Will the government clarify the definition of Aboriginality to determine who can serve on the body?
4. How will members be elected, chosen or appointed?
5. How many people will make up the body?
6. How much will it cost taxpayers annually?
7. What are its functions and powers?
8. Is it purely advisory, or will it have decision-making capabilities?
9. Who will oversee the body and ensure it is accountable?
10. If needed, can the body be dissolved and reconstituted in extraordinary circumstances?
11. How will the government ensure that the body includes those who still need to get a platform in Australian public life?
12. How will it interact with the Closing of the Gap process?
13. Will the government rule out using the Voice to negotiate any national treaty?
14. Will the government commit to local and regional Voices, as recommended in the report on the co-design process led by Tom Calma and Marcia Langton?
15. If not, how will it [the government] effectively address the real issues that impact people’s lives daily on the ground in the community

These questions are basic questions and to think they will be answered after the referendum, don't you think Albanese is being disingenuous to the Australian people???
This has to be the most devisive and dangerous referendum ever proposed!
Why do the left tell lies and treat everyone as mugs?
The Carma Langton report stated on pg17 that the voice can be legislated, which SA has already done so, but now we are asked to vote on a Anthony Albanese election promise brain fart with little detail and will make it harder to get the voice legislated if the referendum comes back with a "NO".
Bill Shorten will have to take over!