Julian Leeser explains the Lib view., page-3

First 3 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Scott th Ratbag

58,505 Posts.

668

04/04/23

04:05

Post #: 67116629
Share

Originally posted by Devilmaycare: ↑

"and finally the matter of Dutton repeatedly asking for the detail which they all know will be developed in parliament after the referendum."

These are the 15 questions
1. Who will be eligible to serve on the body?
2. What are the prerequisites for nomination?
3. Will the government clarify the definition of Aboriginality to determine who can serve on the body?
4. How will members be elected, chosen or appointed?
5. How many people will make up the body?
6. How much will it cost taxpayers annually?
7. What are its functions and powers?
8. Is it purely advisory, or will it have decision-making capabilities?
9. Who will oversee the body and ensure it is accountable?
10. If needed, can the body be dissolved and reconstituted in extraordinary circumstances?
11. How will the government ensure that the body includes those who still need to get a platform in Australian public life?
12. How will it interact with the Closing of the Gap process?
13. Will the government rule out using the Voice to negotiate any national treaty?
14. Will the government commit to local and regional Voices, as recommended in the report on the co-design process led by Tom Calma and Marcia Langton?
15. If not, how will it [the government] effectively address the real issues that impact people’s lives daily on the ground in the community

These questions are basic questions and to think they will be answered after the referendum, don't you think Albanese is being disingenuous to the Australian people???
This has to be the most devisive and dangerous referendum ever proposed!
Why do the left tell lies and treat everyone as mugs?
The Carma Langton report stated on pg17 that the voice can be legislated, which SA has already done so, but now we are asked to vote on a Anthony Albanese election promise brain fart with little detail and will make it harder to get the voice legislated if the referendum comes back with a "NO".
Bill Shorten will have to take over!

Expand

as I've posted numerous times, as Albanese and numerous others I've referred to such as Prof Anne Twomey, the details of the voice is to be debated and determined by vote with amendments, some of which Dutton might put forward, after the referendum.

did you happen to watch Leeser's speech?
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

ASE

Astute delivers high-grade lithium hits at Red Mountain

Rokeby, BHM, more: The 10 hot stocks HotCopper users watchlisted in Week 30

What is going on here? Watch out for DroneShield, Pure Hydrogen, and Nel ASA

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 019 – Dreaming of the 9,000s

ASX Market Close: Fading miners drag bourse as iron ore price slumps | July 25

Most investors will get this earnings season wrong. Will you?

SGQ

St George banks $5M from placement to ramp up Araxá Rare Earths Project

RNU

Renascor produces graphite concentrate at Siviour, right on time to meet ex-China demand

Friday's HotCopper trends: Renascor concentrate, Larvotto raise | July 25

FTL

Firetail scoops up untested land around Excelsior – including juicy mineralisation target