" despite a sound business/employment case." Sorry Dex , there...

  1. 27,461 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 82
    " despite a sound business/employment case."​


    Sorry Dex , there was no, that's no pro case worthy of consideration , in footy parlance, " it was kick and hope ", ​


    Reaganomics has been totally debunked.


    Debunking the Reagan Myth


    For it did fail. The Reagan economy was a one-hit wonder. Yes, there was a boom in the mid-1980s, as the economy recovered from a severe recession. But while the rich got much richer, there was little sustained economic improvement for most Americans. By the late 1980s, middle-class incomes were barely higher than they had been a decade before — and the poverty rate had actually risen.


    https://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/21/opinion/21krugman.html[/BCOLOR]

    The New American Economy: The Failure of Reaganomics and a New Way Forward


    As a domestic policy advisor to Ronald Reagan, Bruce Bartlett was one of the originators of Reaganomics, the supply-side economic theory that conservatives have clung to for decades. In
    The New American Economy
    , Bartlett goes back to the economic roots that made
    Impostor
    a bestseller and abandons the conservative dogma in favor of a policy strongly based on what's worked in the past. Marshalling compelling history and economics, he explains how economic theories that may be perfectly valid at one moment in time under one set of circumstances tend to lose validity over time because they are misapplied under different circumstances. Bartlett makes a compelling, historically-based case for large tax increases, once anathema to him

    Raider​
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.