Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Are you sure about that? Both of those graphics (land only vs...

First 5 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
genericmicrobe

4,175 Posts.

2

21/08/19

11:44

Post #: 40073839
Share

Originally posted by mjp2 ↑

you do not understand the need for time of observation changes to be corrected for
and that that is a specific issue for the United States

you do not understand the need for site and instrument changes to be corrected for

---

you do not understand that the corrections made overall reduce the amount of warming measured

---

Yet we get this continuous, ignorant conspiracy theory about these adjustments
From deluded people who think the worlds climate scientists, and the plethora of science academies, that vouch for the science findings, are up to some conspiracy to fake data,
It's an absurd nonsense from absurd people
or from people gas lighting nonsense on behalf of vested interests

---

Sorry chaps and ladies, but it is you that is failing the critical thinking test

Expand

Are you sure about that? Both of those graphics (land only vs global) use the same land data ie ghcmn 4 Which is adjusted for tob. The global one is merged with ersst 5 which is clearly changing the measured land values and has nothing to do with tob adjustments as they have been made in both surely?
3 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 78 more messages in this thread...

First 5 Last