Come now, lrj. I thought you had material by "equally reputable and qualified specialists"as a counterpoint to Dr Barnett's article? As you said so eloquently:
"The focus of derision is not science or good research but the propagandists who use the issue to promote an agenda that does not essentially belong to science. It is those, who generally are intolerant of valid research that does not coincide with their own grab bag of prejudices, that need to be exposed as modern day charlatans at best if not analogous to the religious inquisitors of the past."
