Thanks! I'm not sure you read it though. At best it's unrelated to what I asked and at worst it actually opposes your claim :
"We found that we were able to predict yields in the field with high accuracy from container-grown plants"
It's talking about a method indoor growing that more replicates the conditions of field trials. No one here is claiming glass house trials are the same as field trials, but you seem adamant that yield gains seen in glass house trials don't transfer, and this study doesn't support that.
Essentially I was wondering what supports your notion that testing yield vs a control group indoors is fundamentally different than doing it outdoors. In both trials the environment is the same for both groups, so unless there is something inextricably linked between OHD and green houses I'm not sure where your concern comes from. I was hoping you could enlighten us.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- ************** just tipped GPP
Thanks! I'm not sure you read it though. At best it's unrelated...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 80 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add GNM (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
1.2¢ |
Change
0.001(9.09%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.855M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.2¢ | 1.2¢ | 1.2¢ | $1.696K | 141.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 394 | 1.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.3¢ | 310435 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 394 | 0.012 |
4 | 1132815 | 0.011 |
6 | 1729995 | 0.010 |
4 | 1033429 | 0.009 |
6 | 1739995 | 0.008 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.013 | 310435 | 2 |
0.014 | 200000 | 1 |
0.015 | 157000 | 2 |
0.019 | 210000 | 1 |
0.020 | 26667 | 1 |
Last trade - 13.45pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
GNM (ASX) Chart |