JWs and blood, page-210

@angusmcfangledang the reply function is not working.
Please show me where I told you that I didn't read your posts because I have little regard for them and I will apologise.
I don't agree with some of your posts but that is not the same as having no regard for them. I take that as testing them rather than having little regard for them.
I asked you questions about God and doctrine which, I hope that you will agree with me are central to Christianity to test claims about the existence of God and the validity of Christian doctrine. I don't believe that I have already asked these questions or indeed received answers from you.
---
I didnt state what i believe the foundation of christianity is
i used christs words in Matthew 16.16
I clearly put forward what he said this was
He said this was the rock he would build his church

Matthew 16: (New International Version)
16 Simon Peter answered, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”
Nothing about the rock he would build his church there.
Didn't you mean Matthew 16:18?
Matthew 16: (New International Version)
18 And I tell you that you are Peter,[a] and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it.
---
Why are you bringing this up with me?
Is this response supposed to be a response to the claim that God exists?
Peter may be the rock on which the church is built for which there appears to be agreement going on the lack of response.
For me, that is a good response to Christian doctrine and history.
If it can be established which church this was, arguments about the identity of the first church may be settled.
That for me would be a good outcome.