McClintock and Strong’s Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, though advocating the Trinity doctrine, acknowledges regarding Matthew 28:18-20: “This text, however, taken by itself, would not prove decisively either the personality of the three subjects mentioned, or their equality or divinity.” (1981 reprint, Vol. X, p. 552)
Here is a reference I have read. Nowhere have I read that the authenticity of the text from Matt 28:18-20 has been challenged. Why would it be?
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- JW's, Mormons, Armstrongs, Baha's -- nice people yet deceived
McClintock and Strong’s Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 20 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
BGD
BARTON GOLD HOLDINGS LIMITED
Alex Scanlon, Managing Director & CEO
Alex Scanlon
Managing Director & CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online