"fundamentally flawed given the constant references to the Uran LIMITED historical graph."
All the graphs were on searches for KAB only RB, have a look on the name of the charts. You talk of weeks that KAB has been in existence, and want credability.... the ASX data tells me quite differently. Brewer has been in charge for almost a year, manganese been around that long as well, yet you want us to belief it is only weeks old, lol.
I fail to follow any of this logically. Can you explain more precisely please, and which date YOU believe KAB listed on the exchange.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- kaboko mining - technical analysis
"fundamentally flawed given the constant references to the Uran...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 24 more messages in this thread...
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)