Kamala is going to get wrecked in the debate, page-407

Youre lying again

I never said they did it cause they changed their mind. For whatever reason and for the argument Ill agree fetal abnormalities arent included in my view...but when you say the reasons are "maternal life endangerment"...we all know and its a fact, they use the terms "health" as the catch-all and never stipulate that to only include physical health. In many states that is read to include emotional health, psychological and financial health.

But back to my question which you CLEARLY cant and wont answer and so you can be clear...if the reason is NOT the mother's physical health that's at risk by carrying the baby and its NOT a fetal abnormality then.....

If a woman wants an abortion after at least the point of viability and to deliver the child does not imperil her life...give me a reason why the child should not be delivered at term and allowed to live?

Why when a delivery does occur...why kill the baby before the delivery?