What was talked about in the meeting room resulted in the FTA that you are reading.It includes the intentions and exceptions that both parties decided were necessary to outline. Obviously they both found that they could not reach an agreement on par with the US/AU FTA and accepted that fact.
The media sector is just one of many examples of the limitations that they agreed to.
My issue with what you posted originally was that you made a false claim about Australia disallowing investments and then trying to attribute those allegations to breaches of the FTA.i.e. You posted "It refers to investment above 1 billion in general in FTA which should be exempt from FIRB review."- which is not true as I have proven to you (refer to my earlier posts regarding Annex III).
The goodwill between Australia and China is a worthy discussion, but it is not the discussion that I entered into.
