Upon reading the Kleos AFR article, I do wonder how many might find it inconceivable that someone who has been engaged in an advisory capacity reflects, in retrospect, on their time performing such advisory services as "a learning curve". I wonder how holders of those stocks might feel about that statement and if they feel as though they might be owed a return of fees?
I hope for Kleos investors' sake, the forthcoming role said person is undertaking is also not another learning opportunity - after all, it is a highly lucrative and very financially rewarding role that reflects higher demands than learning on the job.
