To the FAs out there, what are your thoughts on the following?
NMS H1 results is $13M less than last year's. This implies the eps impact is approx. -3c ps. Consequently, the sp dropped 60c-47c=13c.
From the PE perspective, the sp drop created a reactive (marginal?) PE of 13c/3c = 4.3. Yet, the current PE is 7.3, which implies that the shares are oversold by 13c-4.3/7.3x13c=5.4c. In other words, the current PE places the sp at 47c+5.4c=52.4c.
Alternatively, the current PE of 7.3 implies that the market anticipates NPAT of 47c/7.3=6.4c ps for H2. But at NPAT of 6.4c ps, the return is very good, indeed. Therefore, should NMS deliver the expected H2 results, the sp will appreciate accordingly.
I haven't fully thought through the flaws in this analysis yet. Please feel free to disprove using FA. Ta!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BLV
- knowing the industry before you invest
knowing the industry before you invest, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 26 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BLV (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online