If there is a Kobold deal and the intricacies dictate
1. AVZ/ dathcom restored as rightful owner of exploration right to tennament
2. upon purchase of tenement rights by Kobold from AVZ/dathcom DRC issues ML to Kobold (As they will all info AVZ/dathcom used to satisfy ML prerequisites and won’t have infighting in their company/JV).
3. does it then still matter if AVZ/dathcom own a ML? NO
what matters is that a deal is struck that satisfies all parties and either carries out or compensates for all outstanding contracts.
The value lies within the fact that AVZ should rightfully and lawfully be the owner of the Manono tenement ML.
when fair and reasonable contracts are now drawn up and executed it matters little if AVZ/dathcom hold a ML (unless you’re CATH). What matters is that all parties are satisfied and in agreement.
KoBold Makes Offer for Congo Lithium as Country Courts US, page-1861
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?