Share
1,015 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 545
clock Created with Sketch.
04/06/25
11:45
Share
Originally posted by tendoji:
↑
I think there’s value to think whether AVZ was seeking a trading suspension on an event that does not point to the 16 month feud, a feud that can be said to have started with Dathomir late December 2020 after the Ganfeng offtake. Also because the mining decree was awarded on April 25, but only 9 days later it was used as a pretext to place good news above bad news. A tactic AVz has used previously on June 4 2018 by which Klaus placed an exclamation on 3 days later with selling half his portfolio. you can only read an announcement with healthy scepticism — which since last ICC doc as revealed by ICC reporting that AVZ claims they forced to relinquish the North CDL zonation rather than the neutral “excluded” as stated in the May 4 2022 announcement. It’s clear AVZ disrespected its CD compliance obligations “forced” is not “excluded” obviously. So AVZ under duress needed a way out, and who knows may be Klaus and Nigel did a mate’s favour, and said I’ll do this clown show with the Congolese and then you can call a trading suspension — any number of scenarios like this could have occurred — as I said it’s worth thinking not the obvious because AVZ needed a way out of pretending there is no impingement to its progress
Expand
WGAF!