in all seriousness, While Kobold deal is still unclear what it...

in all seriousness, While Kobold deal is still unclear what it constitutes for a payout and what AVZ Manono value ought to be, and

what the timeline for ICSID might entail compared to the Statutory time limit (6 years from first instance of misleading statement) to litigate on alleged misleading statements from 2021, 2022, then,

it is the rational thing to do: prepare to protect your capital by considering how AVZ may have misled each one of you. You need to know how that works: what are the tests for a legitimate claim in a court of law.

Understanding your unique situation within the overall class action takes time. I’m saying all this in case there is a need, you need to prepare for it sooner rather than later. I think Nigel and Co. would respect the fact some or many would want to litigate.

Most likely litigating would be via a Class Action unless you have a massive loss claim and 1/2 a million+ to go it alone.

It makes perfect sense to prepare a litigation plan up until you see $$ from the Kobold deal.

Many have already warned if they don’t get the share price they expect they would consider litigation.

All the focus on Congolese and Chinese corruption has been a distraction simply because it is an easy given and we can wipe our hands clean of incompetence to hold past May 4,
=======
Shareholders need to demonstrate their own reliance on AVZ statements in 2021, 2022.

They would need to prepare that now because the clock is running out.
I appreciate that currently this is not a popular topic — but don’t be fooled into giving up your legal entitlement for ‘Team AVZ’

NB: Many of you will fail to show correct reliance on AVZ, as you likely relied on each other here or on Twitter. And because AVZ knows who you they may track your online presence to defeat you. —Litigation is inherently risky even in a solid case.