Thank you Beo for replying.
The last we officially saw $AVZ name BNB again only under pressure from the ASX was on October 17, 2018, where AVZ submitted to justify its GBF report comments on financing, that it is in discussions with BNB and Tinci . AVZ cited the scoping from 8 days earlier so that this did not look like new information.
However upon checking, I can’t see BNB and Tinci, but only “live mous”.
Our Hobart taxi driver, emailed AVZ in Novermber because someone (not AVZ looking at ASIC register strictly) was targeting certain shareholders with a disinformation campaign from August September 2018, that BNB was affected by Optimum Nano indirectly due to its creditors affected by ON’s parent going insolvent. More on this hogwash from Ninja to come.
Safe to say, AVZ in reply did refer to a mention of BNB, but hastened to point to March 12, 2018 announcement as current. AVZ advised there was nothing soon on financing. Which was no surprise considering a very tense Congolese election was commencing.
In December 20/21 2018, Giantpaperclip5 discovered what was in his opinion an error in AVZ’s BNB MOU, on SPiC as SPG, but wasn’t sure. The Hobart Taxi driver then went launched ‘comprehensive mode’ a deep learning curve on the culture of China on the internet to determine once and for all who is who on the BNB MOU. What he found he kept to himself except for a few others who still believed Ninja was working for them. But what sparked a question to hack away at China websites, was that scoping study, Beo. PAM’s SC6 pricing was modelled as SC5, which for our HTD after quizzing Ninja, and Ninja defensive about the data point declaring it was from FT, but FT didn’t publish that, which then meant Ninja becoming emotional it WAS there when he sourced meant the belief in Ninja, was cracking….
Expand
