Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Lab Housing Policy and Negative Gearing, page-39

First 39 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Trees

43,854 Posts.

95

30/01/24

08:03

Post #: 72123913
Share

Originally posted by TheCapatilist ↑

All this talk of scrapping negative gearing is
mindless. So what’s the plan? You can’t claim
any expenses? You can only claim expenses up
to the value of income received?
The government are quite happy to tax
investments that are positively geared , so why
is negative gearing on the nose?
All anyone seems to talk about with negative
gearing is housing, what about other investments
what’s the plan there?
Seems to be a lot of rhetoric around gearing and
capital gains but not much detailed thought and
no plan from the left other than jealousy.

For what its worth I have never intentionally
negatively geared, I think it’s a stupid idea
from a financial perspective.

Expand

only positive in my world

why pay money to get a % back

silly to me
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

4DX

4DMedical lands Philips US reseller deal with eye to Veterans Affairs' market post-lung damage

ESR

Estrella first foreign entity to win tenements in Timor-Leste under new laws ahead of 2025 tenders

STK

5.6g/t gold intercept at Serbia's Rogozna supports Strickland's hopes for high-grade core

ACW

Actinogen Medical ramps up Alzheimer’s treatment trials, targeting fast-track global approvals

COD

Coda Minerals (ASX:COD) enters rights issue to further exploration in South Australia

The market's shrugged at China's stimulus measures all year. Why is this one different?

DEG

HotCopper users muse on De Grey's denial of Agnico Eagle takeover bid – but who are Agnico?

ZER

Zeta Resources seeks to resolve the Panoramic takeover story

The winners & losers on market if negative gearing were gone

NAM

ACCC seeks Olam divestments before its acquisition of Namoi Cotton can go ahead

There are more pages in this discussion • 93 more messages in this thread...

First 39 Last