Sojourner's comments are quite valid as the company has clearly...

Sojourner's comments are quite valid as the company has clearly stated that POC 1 had been working on their device for many years and could not get it to work until Mix & Go was utilised in the process. If, somehow, POC 1 has got their device to work without Mix & Go being used in the first release then this contradicts the statement that they could not get it to work without Mix & Go.

Surely this requires some form of explanation from GC, if it is true, as this could seriously affect the value which will accrue to Mix & Go despite their direct staff involvement for many years. If the benefits are not going to be significant then perhaps ADO should withdraw their specialists and place them where better results and returns could be obtained.

Maybe POC 1 have learnt enough through their collaboration with ADO to be able to go it alone.