Australia’s evolving approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict can be understood through a constructivist lens, which emphasises how norms and ideas shape state behaviour and identity. According to Barnett (2014), constructivism highlights the socially constructed nature of an actor’s identity and interests, influenced by recognized norms and ideas within the international community. In the context of foreign policy, this perspective suggests that a state’s behaviour is influenced by its established state identity and the norms it embraces. A constructivist analysis unveils the underlying dynamics driving Australia’s stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict. At the core of Australia’s position lies its commitment to human rights and international humanitarian norms (Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, 2020). This commitment is evidenced by its early endorsement of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and its continued support for various international agreements to safeguard human rights.
In the context of the Israel-Palestine conflict, Australia’s support for Palestinian self-determination underscores its adherence to humanitarian principles. The nation’s diplomatic trajectory is also influenced by shifting public sentiment. A survey reported by The Guardian (2023) showed a growing inclination (21%) to support Palestinians, with a decrease in support for Israel (17%), and most respondents (61%) advised Australia not to become fully involved in the conflict. This growing public awareness has exerted pressure on policymakers to reassess Australia’s diplomatic approach to the conflict.
https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2024/03/02/navigating-diplomatic-waters-australias-evolving-stance-on-the-israel-palestine-conflict/
