Respectfully disagree with those scientists and doctors who knocked the Barrington declaration , many of whom are now known to be financially compensated to go against it and follow the protocols promoted by pharma so called science religion.
Read the well footnoted The Real Anthony Fauci for more clarity and many other books that spell it out.
Herd immunity is far more complex than survival of the fittest considering this virus was known to predominantly affect the elderly, the Barrington declaration would cover that.
You neglect to mention how Covid deaths were far lower than claimed and authorities have admitted as much today for 2 main reasons.
1 the inefficient PCR tests were used to determine if you had it and if you died within 3 weeks of having tested positive you were classed as a Covid death no matter what the cause of death was.
2 If you were jabbed and died within 3 weeks for any reason at all, then you were listed as unjabbed and if you tested positive during thst period, again were classed as a Covid death.
No chance to blame the jab.
Oh i could go on.
My business status is irrelevant to this conversation but if your asking i didn't have one when the Pandemic was declared.
If you are referring to the protocols used during the Spanish flu post WW1 as the last pandemic which it can only be, again i respectfully disagree to their effectiveness as the world did not lockdown the way it did this time and that pandemic affected the young far far worse than Covid19 .
Pharma's lodged patents for these jabs which came well before Covid and changing the description of vaccination from innoculation to protection should also raise many red flags as to the timing.
It astounds me you are not tearing strips off the pharma companies for their unconscionable money grubbing behaviour.
When are people going to stop saying they saved lives?
Also why did Scomo buy 250 million jabs at $100 a pop sight unseen and most of which have been scrapped?
www.aihw.gov.au › reports › children-youth › covid-19-and-young-people
