landau reply to shapiro reply

I don't warm to the informality that "pete" adopts in his email corrrespondence to shareholders, I hope that his dealings with the DMR are conducted a little more professionally. Although he replied to JW, I'm still waiting for a reply to my email sent over a month ago!! I'm not happy getting ignored, either reply to all of the company's shareholders or reply to none. It seems that he only wants to answer the easy questions. If Shapiro's reply is a mixture of "fact and fiction" then why not elaborate and explain exactly what is fact and what is fiction. It couldn't be that hard surely? Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for a reply "Pete".

Stagman