Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Landlords are Leaches, page-594

First 594 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Tinwins

15,439 Posts.

530

28/04/24

11:37

Post #: 73542627
Share

Originally posted by Cosmoterios ↑

You guys don't get it.

Most people who invested in residential properties are subsidizing the renter as they lose money every year. That why you have Negative Gearing.

An average residential investment loses between $6k to $8k a year. Imagine if the Gov have to fork out $6k to $8k per rental??? That's $18B per year.

Further, Negative Gearing Only gives 45% (assuming they are on the highest marginal tax rate) back to the property owner, in the form of tax refund. So on a negative geared property of $6k (ie. $6k loss), the property investor only gets back $2,700. And loses $3,300 per year.

That is the $3,300 per rental, per year ($10B per year) is the Gov saving. On top of that, the Gov doesn't have to fork out the money to build the rental property.

That's why they push it out to the private sector.

Expand

WRONG!
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

RHI

Red Hill Minerals Signs $6.5 Million Agreement with Peel Mining to Explore Curnamona Project, NSW

TVN

Tivan and EARTH AI gear up to commence fresh drilling at Sandover lead-silver project, NT

KGL

KGL sniffs 19% Cu from drilling at Rockface play in NT

The Big Deal: Free-to-air TV swings the axe, but will it be enough as enormous sports deal bills loom?

Climate change to drive market trends to the moon

There are more pages in this discussion • 612 more messages in this thread...

First 594 Last