Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Landlords are Leaches, page-594

First 594 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Tinwins

15,382 Posts.

528

28/04/24

11:37

Post #: 73542627
Share

Originally posted by Cosmoterios ↑

You guys don't get it.

Most people who invested in residential properties are subsidizing the renter as they lose money every year. That why you have Negative Gearing.

An average residential investment loses between $6k to $8k a year. Imagine if the Gov have to fork out $6k to $8k per rental??? That's $18B per year.

Further, Negative Gearing Only gives 45% (assuming they are on the highest marginal tax rate) back to the property owner, in the form of tax refund. So on a negative geared property of $6k (ie. $6k loss), the property investor only gets back $2,700. And loses $3,300 per year.

That is the $3,300 per rental, per year ($10B per year) is the Gov saving. On top of that, the Gov doesn't have to fork out the money to build the rental property.

That's why they push it out to the private sector.

Expand

WRONG!
1 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

Time for retail therapy buying in the shopping Scentre for hot stocks

SS1

Sun Silver submits US$60M Silver Paste Funding Application to US DoE

End of FY is a time to juggle wins, losses and capital gains taxes

Eurozone-based companies find new ways to secure a regional lithium supply

With financials holding the fort, materials must step up with some heavy lifting to stimulate stocks

There are more pages in this discussion • 612 more messages in this thread...

First 594 Last