jantimot
I absolutely agree with your comments. It would appear that the only people who have the remotest idea of what is at Rocklands are the people invited to finance and build the plant.
For the shareholders who have been holding for all these years our actual knowledge is as you quotation, "So we have a volume of ore body of 170 x 35 x 75, or 446,250 cu. m. At an average density of 2.93 this gives a total tonnage of 1.3Mt, or a bit less than half a years throughput for the mill."
WM has done a better job than could have been achieved by any of the following,MI5, CIA, KGB or Mossad. Now that is some achievement. Without a doubt that would stop any corporation from attempting a takeover.
There is only one problem, it's a two edged sword. There are a bunch of highly intelligent posters on here some of whom have viewed the situation and believe the story. Some are Geologists, some have extensive experience associated with the mining game. The two edged sword is, faith and treachery.
The simple fact remains we are taking the JESUIT view "blind faith in a simple concept". Sometimes it is necessary to listen to people like jantimot.
This is very frightening especially considering the second bulk testing results were due a month ago.
The comments about mine financing prior to a ML are valid, however it would be a big help to the critical path.
I will sleep much better when this deal is stitched up because it will mean someone has worked over the numbers and is privileged to a lot of information we as shareholders are not privy to.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?