E92,
You refer to a strategic objective for the deposit , not to any results of engineering studies based on the current Tumas resource.
Put simply, can you explain why we should expect Tumas to have cash costs sub $30/lb (ie similar to LH) if it has similar resource characteristics to LH, faces the same operating environment but is approx half the grade.
Have you considered what price is required to achieve the IRR objective of 20% for the project with a cash cost of $30/lb and capex of $350M for 3 mlb pa operation, as per the "Objective" ? Probably around $60-70/lb .... which is my point.
Let me know what is false and misleading regarding my use and extrapolation of real operational and cost data provided by Paladin (for LH) to the Tumas project.
Happy to be proven wrong as I am a shareholder!
E92,You refer to a strategic objective for the deposit , not to...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 92 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add DYL (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.46 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.415B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.48 | $1.48 | $1.44 | $40.72M | 27.90M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6495 | $1.45 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.46 | 228546 | 3 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| DYL (ASX) Chart |