That made me laugh makka. If that were true, Alan Jones, Ray Hadley, Kyle Sandilands, etc who've engaged in a lot worse than Latham, would have been sacked long ago.
Having a good laugh is important to well being but I think you missed the point. My point is a private organisation should be free to decide who and who they do not sack based on their business policy. I am no fan of shock jocks like Kyle Sandilands either.
Obviously Latham isn't a crowd puller so tolerance thresholds are much lower.
That may be partly true as well. Reaper stated that the sacking was a freedom of speech issue. I'm arguing that his sacking had nothing to do with freedom of speech.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- latham shown the door by skynews
latham shown the door by skynews, page-38
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)