LCK Price, page-2002

I’m watching with anticipation to see what the re-engagement and breaching of Creeker’s protocol will bring Rocket!

It became a very futile exercise when for almost 9 months, misconceived information was met with facts and still ignored, in order “fertilize” what a group 4 or 5 ex-posters and holders want to happen, but is actually very far from reality. It seemed like a total waste of time, hence, the reason why the ignore option was introduced by me.

If there was some benefit for other holders to put the smoke out, and if the ex-holder/s were able to accept and move on from the “told you so, prove me wrong” rubbish, then perhaps there may be a benefit. I mean, at the end of the day, we invest to support our children’s future, improve our lifestyle, support our retirement etc. What is so wrong with that? Learning to respect people’s investment decisions may just save others a whole world of trouble, and perhaps enable them to focus their time and energy on finding an investment that could bring them the aforementioned positive investment outcomes.