LCK Price, page-35

Thanks Jim. All good clear points and I very much agree. I'm a little confused though, as weren't all of those elements present prior to the all important demonstration of actually being able to use the resource? Was the company not facing those same issues, when it wasn't even sure if the technology and process would work with this anecdotal application? This has been at highs of .42 with fewer goals kicked, so is it reasonable to be shocked that major progress in the project (With all of the elements/ concerns you mentioned being a constant) has actually resulted in the SP sitting at around 50% of all time highs? Also, I'm hoping you or others might be able to mention some other scenarios where firms have back flipped on a placement price after agreement, as I didn't really read a straight answer/ response from you there, and honestly have not seen that before. I find that very distasteful, pending info I'm not aware of (Which I acknowledge is likely/ hopefully the case). I hope that when we agree to something with an investor, we see it through on our part (Under normal circumstances). Finally, which individuals were being slandered? Is that a reference to my posts or somebody else's?Thanks for your insight, Jim. Good to hear from you and other regulars on this stock.