hawk, re the revenue 'stopping' when the IP agreement is...

hawk, re the revenue 'stopping' when the IP agreement is finished being allocated (in about a year); that is true if Lumos is simply one IP agreement, and that is the end of the Company; yet that is untrue; there is no reason to think Lumos will not continually have sales and new contracts and even new IP agreements - THAT IS WHAT THEY DO... and have done for years

we can argue BHP should be NIL value because they have contracts, but those contracts have a fixed term, therefore if one assumes BHP will just finish all their contracts and sign no more, then NIL price it is

I really, really dont get the negative view of Lumos by Mr Market; this was a 10 cent share pushed down by two cap raises and 'fun and games by insiders'; as I posted before, Lumos has a bad smell about it to Mr Market and management do not seem to care; the only fix to this is to get into profitability; but even as we close in on profitability, management seem to be more interested in seeing how much they can pocket, then playing for the big casino win in a year or two

What management need to worry about is some other player coming on the scene that knows how to market and get daily sales and not just dream about some far away lottery win (all the while paying themselves millions); I really do hope we win the lottery, gather up that big casino win, but will management then just up their remuneration ten fold and leave some crumbs to the owners

This is what really annoys me... WE ARE THE OWNERS and management are treating us like crap