I am pretty sure that trial is not FebriDx;
that is the problem I have; some outback health service is running their own agenda; the govt does not REALLY care re AMR; they care about the talking points; so if you get some person (some Dr) into the ear of the govt with THEIR barrel they are pushing (I will bet you find some financial incentive to the pushers) - then THAT will be the outcome;
some Dr will 'invent' some test strip and get a contract from the govt to make it in their garage in Canberra; and it does not matter it is not the best outcome for AMR or the patients... the pushers get rich and the govt says re-elect us for helping you so much (sending YOUR tax dollars to a 2nd rate solution)
and note the article talks re 'trial' and 'proof of efficacy' , etc; the FebriDx product has done all that and it already there; yet some outback yobbos are gonna do it 'their way'; where is FebriDx management in the ear of the govt
(20min delay)