and particularly interested to hear what GBB has to say, since he has so much personal experience with the project.
Awesome. Ok so lets talk about what youd like to talk about then perhaps I read somewhere he said.... a) "none of the original lead remains" (in the pit) b) :"the actual water in the pit has very little lead as there is very little lead there. c) "so no lead" (all as shown in first post Was in the mining pit. (see first post in the thread for reference)
Yet the company found there was samples of high zinc and lead in their deeper drill sampling of the mining pit. Lead is very dangerous and some of the local marine life are unable to be fit for human consumption for as far as 3-4 kms. Samples of water taken just outside the pit was found to be 50,000 time higher then normal sea levels What do you think this was about. How could he miss this fact and why or maybe he forgot about it even. I dont know but you did bring it up so I wondered which one you think it is.
I could read back the answers, Please do or just perhaps you could even give me your own.
EPM Price at posting:
2.1¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
