Must agree with what is highlighted in this thread. I don't believe the owner of a mine declaring there is no lead in a pit mine he's selling is comforting. He would definitely know it is there. It is not a good response when it is such a serious issue. I would expect a seller to be open with shareholders and not hiding it from them. It makes me wonder what other surprises may be in store that are being covered up.
What upset me most, was reading the solution the owner has suggested. Where the pit water could be pumped out into an already lead contaminated sea and calling the sea "lifeless" in justification for doing it, like the sea did not matter, or its loss of marine life so far. It is not lifeless and needs increased levels of protection. The sea is a way of life for the Greenlandic people, they do not need this attitude ill effecting their livelihoods any more. I found these comments quite disturbing, as they are dismissive of these issuers and hiding them and environmentally and socially irresponsible to suggest this as a solution. The water needs to be treated and stop disregarding the environment.
Some of you posters should try be aware of this when ignoring it for short term gains. I hold for the long haul and do not want to have the company buying into headaches that were not presented accurately.
EPM Price at posting:
2.1¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)