1. The Roka Phasha Tribal Council and Chief PD Phasha in their capacity as representatives of the Roka Phasha community claim that the Roka Phasha community has the surface rights over the Eerstegeluk farm and it appears that even Ian Shapiro concedes this fact.
2. Although the Bengwenyama community has lodged a land claim in respect of the Eerstegeluk farm, it is incorrect that the claim has been successful and, in fact, a decision on the claim has not yet been made.
3. Further, is it true that the Bengwenyama community was dispossessed of Eerstegeluk in 1945 or at all?
4. If the presiding judges were so confident of the Bengwenyama community's rights regarding the two farms why didn't the Constitutional Court award the rights to the Bengwenyama community rather than referring the matter back to the DMR for review?
It is clear that factual inaccuracies appear in the judgment.
EuroTravelLover maybe you should have another read of my initial post before jumping to conclusions.
Stagman
NKP Price at posting:
45.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
