"The Community has enjoyed uninterrupted occupation of...

"The Community has enjoyed uninterrupted occupation of Nooitverwacht for more than a century. It was dispossessed of Eerstegeluk in 1945, but has successfully lodged a land claim for its formal restoration to the Community. Despite some earlier skirmishes, it is now accepted that the Community holds both properties (the farms) as owner for the purposes of the application of the Act."

This part of the Constitutional Court judgment is completely erroneous.

Undoubtedly.

How could 12 judges get it so wrong?

Or have they created the dilemma Intentionally as part of a broader agenda?

A line has been drawn In the sand and there is now an expectation that communities will be clearly identifiable and fully consulted in the review of MPRDA legislation.

Stagman