You said he was an Anglican priest.
When it was pointed out that was untrue, you changed it to a "theologian".
When it was pointed out that they are quite different things you now say it is splitting hairs and he was "qualified".
Not sure you have have any idea what you're talking about.
That's what counts.
BTW a poster @RM has pointed out not only was he not an Anglican priest but an occultist.
What do you think of that ?
.
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- Left v Right
Left v Right, page-54
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 19 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LU7
LITHIUM UNIVERSE LIMITED
Alex Hanly, CEO
Alex Hanly
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online